Pittsburgh Pirates: jcharding - Viewing Profile - Pittsburgh Pirates

Jump to content

User Rating: -----

Reputation: 717 Excellent
Group:
Members
Active Posts:
4,559 (1.48 per day)
Most Active In:
Change In Atmosphere Discussion (4551 posts)
Joined:
17-November 08
Profile Views:
40,444
Last Active:
User is online Today, 10:59 PM
Currently:
Viewing Forum: Change In Atmosphere Discussion

My Information

Member Title:
Bulldog Veteran
Age:
Age Unknown
Birthday:
Birthday Unknown
Gender:
Not Telling Not Telling

Contact Information

E-mail:
Private

Latest Visitors

Posts I've Made

  1. In Topic: Penguins Playoff Run

    Today, 10:40 PM

    Think of it this way. Why is it appropriate to punish division winning Washington with having to play the second seed in the second round. Doesn't Washington deserve an easier path for winning its division and being the number 1 overall seed.
  2. In Topic: Hillary Clinton for President

    Today, 04:59 PM

    View PostDale Berra, on 25 April 2017 - 04:49 PM, said:

    Exactly. I can't stand Coulter. But for me this falls right in line with that tired old saying, "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend your right to say it."

    Clearly that saying ain't tired enough...


    I actually agree with this completely. I would only point out that burning a flag in the middle of a university commons is one thing. Burning a flag in the middle of a purple heart gathering is another. There is a mix of scenarios for various types of speech that range from legal and safe, to stupid, to stupid and inciting. And I will end by again pointing out that I don't know what she has been saying, don't know what she plans to say, and don't know the specifics about why the University turned her down, but if the people in the decision makers seat decide its past stupid and ranging into stupid and inciteful, I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.
  3. In Topic: Steeler's Offseason Thread

    Today, 04:48 PM

    View PostNYPirate, on 25 April 2017 - 04:43 PM, said:

    Alrighty then.


    Think of it this way, a 33% chance of Bryant for a full year (which is probably way too low) is more valuable than Gay or Moats all year. Hence I place a much greater need on replacing Gay or Moats than backstopping Bryant should he remain unable to control himself.
  4. In Topic: Hillary Clinton for President

    Today, 04:33 PM

    Federal judge negates Trump's sanctuary city funding block
    http://www.cnn.com/2...tion/index.html
  5. In Topic: Steeler's Offseason Thread

    Today, 04:08 PM

    View PostNYPirate, on 25 April 2017 - 03:38 PM, said:

    I wouldn't. I can't count on him yet.


    I can count on Bryant more than William Gay or Arthur Moats.

Friends

Showing 4 random friends of 4

Comments

jcharding has no profile comments yet. Why not say hello?